The A-Team Blog :: In the Scope 1/10/08

How do we know if someone speaks for God? Amy provided a great response in a post at Stand to Reason.

From Os Guinness to Frank Schaeffer (son of Francis Schaeffer) regarding his latest book, Crazy for God: "What you have written is a tissue of falseness, distortion, and unchecked allegations -- in short of shoddy journalism." (HT: Pro-Existence)

Kim Riddlebarger explains why Mike Huckabee makes him nervous.

My favorite ad for Tim Challies's book has a Canadian flag in the background and simply says "A book, eh?" Apparently, the Canadian market is quite strong and Crossway intends to exploit it.

My co-editor of The New Media Frontier, John Mark Reynolds, will be teaching a special weekend mini-course in February at Biola on Cultural Apologetics. Those in the area will not want to miss it. Someone needs to keep track of how many times John Mark references Star Trek and Disney.

I re-designed RogerOverton.com, mostly so that feeds from my blogs get posted on the front page. Let me know what you think.

I don't really want a pet due to the mess that ensues, but if I did, I'd totally want a fainting goat:

Joanna Martens provided one of the best descriptions of James R. White: "James White kicks major apologetic-argue/debate anything that is against the Bible and leave you on the floor in a fetal position sucking your thumb, butt. His presence alone is intimidating, causing the very walls in the room to vibrate. He's def. not the dude you'd want to meet alone in an alley somewhere, only if it were indeed the great White, you'd be getting the smack down on radical Biblical theology, calling you to repent and believe in Jesus Christ as your personal Savior."

Posted to:

Comments

Re: In the Scope 1/10/08

by Amy on Fri 11 Jan 2008 10:42 AM PST | Profile | Permanent Link

Roger, you should have warned me that the Schaeffer article would make me want to bang my head against a wall. I am so utterly angry right now that...well...I don't think my blood pressure can take it. This sentence: "The tragedy of Francis Schaeffer is that, at some deep inner level, he knew what he preached was a con," just about pushed me over the edge.

Re: Re: In the Scope 1/10/08

by Aaron Snell on Fri 11 Jan 2008 11:12 PM PST | Profile | Permanent Link

Indeed. Angry, and saddened.

Am I wrong, or isn't this a falsehood, too - that he was "born again in a tent revival at age 17"?

Here's the story, in the words of his wife, Edith:

Fran was sent home from a bookstore with a book on Greek philosophy, when he had in fact entered the shop to buy a beginner�s English reading book to help him teach English to a Russian. In God�s providence reading this book on Greek philosophy set his mind on fire�but he soon discovered that the philosophers asked many questions, yet seemed to have no answers to the basic problems of the human condition. Reflecting on this he recognized that the preaching he heard on Sundays in the liberal church he attended was just as devoid of answers. �I wonder,� he mused to himself, �whether I should stop calling myself a Christian, and discard the Bible?� Then he reconsidered, and faced the fact that he had never read the Bible in his life. Since at this time he was reading Ovid, he decided that before discarding the Bible, he�d read some of Ovid and some of the Bible night by night. Gradually he put aside Ovid altogether and spent all the time he had on reading the Bible.

How did he read it? Who helped him to understand? No one gave him any suggestions. He wouldn�t have known who to ask, and in any case, he had no idea that there was any way to read it other than to read it in the same way as any other book. He started at the beginning of Genesis and read to the end. If you want to know why Fran has such high regard for the Bible and feels it is adequate in answering the questions of life, the answer is right here. As a seventeen-year-old boy with a thirst for the answers to life�s questions, he began to discover for himself the existence of adequate and complete answers right in the Bible. . . .

Sometime in the next six months Francis Schaeffer became a Christian. He believed and bowed before God, accepting Christ as his Savior, having come to an understanding directly from the Word of God itself. He thought he had discovered something no one else knew about. He thought what he had found was unique, and that he alone had found it. If what he had discovered was being a Christian, then he thought he was the only one. But�he didn�t call himself that. It was a transforming reality that changed his whole outlook; it began to change his marks at school and the way he looked at the woods. But, for a time, he did not know that there was anyone else who shared this truth he felt he had discovered. You see, he thought that Christianity was what he heard preached by an old-fashioned liberal who gave ethical talks and who did not preach Biblical truth. At that time Fran was totally ignorant of the fact that there was any other kind of preaching.

Re: Re: Re: In the Scope 1/10/08

by Anonymous on Mon 14 Jan 2008 12:56 PM PST | Permanent Link

Here's the link of the interview that Jeff had with Frank on Jan. 11th.

Re: Re: Re: Re: In the Scope 1/10/08

by Anonymous on Mon 14 Jan 2008 12:57 PM PST | Permanent Link

http://www.therevealer.org/archives/main_story_002908.php

Re: Re: In the Scope 1/10/08

by Charlie on Thu 17 Jan 2008 06:11 AM PST | Profile | Permanent Link

It is Jeff Sharlet, after all. His one "big idea" has always been that evangelicals are dangerous fools, and he looks for every opportunity to push the knife deeper.

Trackbacks

TrackBack URL:
http://ateam.blogware.com/blog/_trackback/3459205

No trackbacks found.