At first glance, Planet Narnia may sound like an odd name for a book. But according to many C.S. Lewis scholars, it is the most groundbreaking study on Lewis's Narnian Chronicles in at least the past 40 years. This week, I'll be posting a three part interview with the author of Planet Narnia, Dr. Michael Ward. I don't usually do this, but since there is plenty of information about the book online and the interview assumes some knowledge of its thesis, I figured it would be helpful to provide a brief introduction to the book. Most of what appears below is taken from the book's website: www.planetnarnia.com

Thesis: The book argues that Lewis secretly based the Chronicles of Narnia on the seven heavens of the medieval cosmos.

What are the seven heavens? 

According to astronomers before Copernicus in the sixteenth century, the seven heavens contained the seven planets which revolved around Earth and exerted influences over people and events and even the metals in the Earth's crust. The seven planets of the old cosmology included the Sun (Sol) and the Moon (Luna), which we now don't regard as planets at all. The other five were Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn.

Why was Lewis so interested in the planets? 

Because he regarded them as 'spiritual symbols of permanent value' which were 'especially worthwhile in our own generation' (this is how he wrote about them when introducing his long 1935 poem, 'The Planets').  What made them so timely for his own generation was that these spiritual symbols were headed by Jupiter (Jove), the kingly, festive, and magnanimous planet.  Lewis thought that his own generation was too often 'Saturnocentric', that is, fixated upon Saturn, the planet of calamity and misfortune and death.  This fixation was no surprise because his own generation had been, as he put it, 'born under Saturn'; many of his contemporaries had been doomed to die in the Great War.  But that was an historical accident, not an eternal truth about the nature of the universe.  The qualities associated with Jupiter were, he thought, a better representation of the heart of spiritual reality.  The hierarchical order of the planets, in which Jupiter was enthroned as king over the other six, was a useful reminder of this heart.  'Of Saturn we know more than enough,' he wrote, 'but who does not need to be reminded of Jove?'

Isn't astrology incompatible with Christianity?

It depends what you mean by 'astrology'.  If you mean 'worshipping the planets' or 'regarding the planetary influences as determinative', then, yes, astrology is unChristian.  But 'astrology' doesn't necessarily mean either of those things.  Literally, astrology means 'study of the stars', and there is nothing dangerous, wrong, or foolish about studying God's creation. 

Although the Bible outlaws worship of the 'host of heaven' (see for example, Deuteronomy 4:19; 2 Kings 17:16; Job 31:26f; Jeremiah 8:2), the Bible also allows that the stars have spiritual significance, which is to be respected, studied, and, indeed, acted upon.  The stars proclaim the glory of God, according to the nineteenth psalm (Lewis's favourite), a psalm which St Paul quotes (Romans 10:18) in order to demonstrate how the Gentiles have already heard the preaching of Christ.  The Magi who followed the Star of Bethlehem to the birthplace of Christ clearly understood this (Matthew 2:2, 9-10).

Throughout the Bible the stars are seen as 'signs' (Genesis 1:14; Jeremiah 10:2; Matthew 24:29). Interpretation of these signs is depicted negatively in Isaiah (47:13) and Daniel (1:20; 2:27; 4:7), but only because it was practised by heathens for godless ends, not because such astrological enquiry was considered evil or dangerous per se. Go here for more on this question and other common questions that have been asked about the book.

Almost every Lewis scholar who has read the book at least generally agrees with its thesis. You can read some of the reviews here: http://www.planetnarnia.com/planet-narnia/reviews

The only critic I can find who has read the book and has offered substantial criticism against its thesis is Devin Brown. You can read a discussion between him and Michael Ward (as well as other forum members) on NarniaWeb.

Hugh Hewitt had Michael Ward in studio to talk about the book, and you can listen to that interview here.