I guess they got the idea for this from the Jews' evil plan to use Tom and Jerry...
But don't be worried. It turns out that, as Christians, we'll be much better off under Islamic rule...
|
||||
|
Login
Search
Recent Entries
Recent Reviews
Recent Comments
A-Team Recommends
Roger Recommends...
Amy Recommends...
David Recommends...
Blogroll
Month Archive
September 2007
June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 |
Wednesday, May 16
by
Amy
on Wed 16 May 2007 11:29 AM PDT
I guess they got the idea for this from the Jews' evil plan to use Tom and Jerry...
But don't be worried. It turns out that, as Christians, we'll be much better off under Islamic rule...
Wednesday, May 2
by
Amy
on Wed 02 May 2007 11:57 AM PDT
Yes, Roger and I are still alive. Life took a busy turn for both of us at once, but I should be back to posting regularly now, so be sure to stick around! I'm back today because I just read a brilliant observation by Steve Wagner over on the STR Blog, and I want to direct you all to it. He's responding to this section of the statement given by the We have seen a steady erosion of women's reproductive rights in this country. The Supreme Court's action today, though stunning, in many ways isn't surprising given the current culture in which scientific knowledge frequently takes a back seat to subjective opinion.... My first response to that statement when I read it last week was to object that we'd better have ethics (what they refer to as "subjective opinion") at the center of our decisions rather than "scientific knowledge," or we'll end up with more atrocities like this one. But Steve's deeper observation gets right to the core of the ACOG's hidden assumptions and reveals the hypocrisy inherent in their accusation: My simple request: be consistent. Either put science first or don't. If you want science to trump subjective opinion…let's let science tell us when the unborn is a human being, okay? Science's answer is uncontroversial: it's a living, whole organism, of the human species. You might question the definitions of these terms, but if we know that you are a biological human being, we know the unborn is one too, from the moment she comes into being. That's science. The ACOG might respond, as many scientists do, "Sure, the unborn is a biological human being, but it's too dependent and undeveloped to be a real human being." Done with science so soon? How does any scientist know a certain level of development or independence determine our rights and value? Philosophical reflection. They are doing philosophy, which I assume is a synonym in the ACOG lexicon for "subjective opinion." Read the rest of Steve's post here. |
Order the book co-edited by Roger Overton! About The A-Team
Interviews
Justin Taylor on the ESV Study Bible - Teaser / I / II / III
Justin Taylor on John Owen - I / II / III James Spiegel - Gum, Geckos and God Richard Abanes on Tolle- I / II / III / IV Michael Ward- Intro / I / II / III Kim Riddlebarger- Part I / II / III R. Scott Smith- Part I / II / III Glenn Lucke- Part I / II / III / IV What Roger's Reading
What Amy's Reading
What David's Reading
Ministries & Stuff
|
||